The Hormuz crisis is settling into a recurring cycle of escalation

By Nikolaos Tagoulis

The MoU between Washington and Tehran in mid-June, which set out a 60-day framework for reaching a final settlement, briefly raised hopes that the Hormuz crisis was moving toward a stable resolution. Those expectations soon faded. Over the past week, renewed Iranian attacks on commercial vessels transiting the strait, prompted Washington to reinstate the oil export sanctions suspended under the agreement. The ceasefire effectively collapsed as the US and Iran exchanged airstrikes, commercial shipping came under renewed attack, Tehran again declared Hormuz closed and vessel traffic fell sharply, reversing the recovery in transits recorded in late June and early July. Beyond the immediate hostilities, the broader question of how passage through the waterway will ultimately be governed remains unresolved, leaving the region caught between further escalation and another attempt at de-escalation.

For shipping markets, the deeper consequence lies in the erosion of confidence in any settlement. This is the third arrangement to break down since February, and each new understanding is increasingly viewed as provisional. Against this backdrop, charterers are adopting a more cautious stance, monitoring how the situation unfolds, while prolonged instability is likely to make more owners reluctant to deploy tonnage to the Middle East Gulf.

The spot market's reaction to the July flare-up illustrates how sensitive freight pricing has become to geopolitical signals. TD3C earnings, which had corrected to below $290,000 per day once the post-memorandum rally unwound, turned sharply higher as hostilities resumed, climbing by 18% within four trading days to around $344,000. Swings of this magnitude within a single week have become a recurring feature of the market since the crisis began, with rates responding primarily to headlines rather than underlying cargo flows.

The longer the disruption persists, the more firmly alternative suppliers and routes entrench their position within the market. The United States has ramped up its oil and LNG exports, reinforcing its role as a key energy supplier, while other Atlantic basin producers, including Brazil, Canada and West Africa, are also expanding market share in Asia on structurally longer voyages, a redirection of trade streams that supports tonne-mile demand even as Gulf volumes contract. Russia, meanwhile, is strengthening its ties with Asian buyers, with oil flows to India and China firming and LNG shipments expanding eastward, although Europe has so far remained the principal outlet for its Yamal production. In parallel, Middle Eastern producers are accelerating investment in export infrastructure that bypasses the strait altogether, ranging from expanded crude pipeline capacity to terminals outside the Gulf, to higher volumes routed through Mediterranean outlets. Bypass capacity, currently estimated at about 6.4 mbpd, could rise above 10 mbpd as planned projects come online. This would offer a partial buffer against chokepoint disruption, shifting rather than eliminating seaborne demand, as pipeline barrels would still be loaded onto tankers outside the strait.

The unstable backdrop surrounding the status of Hormuz also weighs heavily on the LNG market, keeping Qatar, the world's second-largest exporter, at a fraction of its normal export levels and leaving a significant share of global LNG supply exposed to the conflict, while the targeting of a laden Qatari LNG carrier by Iran has compounded the sector's sense of vulnerability.

Overall, the Hormuz crisis is settling into a recurring cycle of escalation, partial easing and renewed tension, with each episode leaving the market less confident in the durability of any settlement. The key commercial issue is therefore not simply whether the strait is physically open, but whether shipping market participants view it as reliably tradable. Until that confidence is restored, crude and LNG flows will continue to shift toward alternative routes and suppliers, supporting ton-mile demand while sustaining volatility in vessel deployment, regional tonnage balances and freight earnings.

Data Source: Intermodal